I'm very interested in jons comments on jons blog about the quizzing rule. and the discussion at the quizzing boards
Fred made an announcement that they are going to crack down on that particular rule this year at the invitational. That could be interesting to see.
The rule does not make sense #1. Because competition is good - even if one team has to lose. As long as both teams keep a good spirit in tact. and #2 There is no possible way that a quizmaster can judge a quizzers intent... even if it is evil. #3 if the staff is so concerned about the losers self esteem, then how do they miss all the matches where teams get plastered like 150 - 10... and the crowd continues to cheer the whole time.
hmmmm I'm getting ahead of myself.
I've got more to say on the topic, but might wait to hear what some other people have to say first
Fred made an announcement that they are going to crack down on that particular rule this year at the invitational. That could be interesting to see.
The rule does not make sense #1. Because competition is good - even if one team has to lose. As long as both teams keep a good spirit in tact. and #2 There is no possible way that a quizmaster can judge a quizzers intent... even if it is evil. #3 if the staff is so concerned about the losers self esteem, then how do they miss all the matches where teams get plastered like 150 - 10... and the crowd continues to cheer the whole time.
hmmmm I'm getting ahead of myself.
I've got more to say on the topic, but might wait to hear what some other people have to say first
posted by jeff @ 2:24 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home